Fishing Agreement Uk
The agreement demonstrates the common will of the United Kingdom and Norway to cooperate as independent coastal states and to seek effective and sustainable management of their fisheries. The treaty contains the same principles that the UK is currently seeking with the EU – a framework agreement that reflects the international rights of the UK and Norway. However, in many coastal communities, fishing is an important source of employment, responsible for thousands of jobs. The industry still has political power and the UK and EU are under pressure not to give in. The rights and responsibilities of UK-registered vessels fishing in UK waters will not change. All vessel owners must continue to comply with the legal and conditions of their licence, including current reporting obligations (e.g. B logbooks), economic interconnection criteria and rejection policy. Other independent coastal states, such as Norway, do just that. And the British fishing communities, which strongly support the campaign to leave the EU, are insisting on this fundamental change. It is essentially a question of leverage. For the EU, a sustainable fisheries agreement, signed in parallel with wider trade negotiations, offers the best chance of achieving the largest possible quota for its fishermen. Conversely, a renewable energy agreement, which expires annually, would allow the UK to threaten to avoid EU fishermen outside uk waters if the EU does not give in to UK quota demands in any given year.
Given that an estimated 59% of total Dutch landings and 52% of German catches come from British waters, this would be a strong position for the UNITED Kingdom, at least until the EU was able to take revenge by reducing the UK`s access to its markets (see below). [3] Meanwhile, reports indicate that Frost`s colleague Michel Barnier is exploring borders to find compromises between THE EU coastal states, for which fishing is important: Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden. The EU originally hoped to maintain access to British waters, which have a plethora of fish, after the post-Brexit transition, which ends on 31 December 2020. But the UK wants to restrict access every year and renegotiate fishing rights, a point the EU has rejected. With less than a week to go before a crucial European Council meeting on the future of EU-UK relations, it appears that lingering tensions over fishing rights are likely to destroy a possible deal. He stressed that fishing could not be separated from the rest of the negotiations and that the United Kingdom mistakenly believed that it had a strong hand. „No comprehensive transaction will be possible without a good agreement on this issue. An agreement that provides visibility to fishermen (EU) over time and guarantees them access to British waters. We will not sacrifice their interests,“ he added.
But because of the importance and richness of the UK`s waters, the EU is under enormous pressure from its fishing communities to maintain the status quo. „Overall, it works well. Well, we make things work,“ Lepretre said. We have WhatsApp groups [with the British] so they can tell us where their fishing sites are. When fisheries policy was originally put in place, the intention was to create a free trade area for fish and fish products, with common rules.
