Agreement Or Peace Treaty

The second type of organizational/institutional component aims to resolve the following/future conflicts on substantive issues such as the abuse of state power over human rights and the promotion of transparency and accountability in governance. These mechanisms, often referred to as „peace-building mechanisms“ at the United Nations, help promote the culture of peaceful conflict resolution in a society and public confidence in the state`s ability to systematically and impartially resolve future problems. Implementation mechanisms could include a United Nations or regional peacekeeping mission. These committees may include monitoring committees, chaired by the United Nations or by a neutral third party, including parties to the conflict and other relevant actors who must contribute to peace-building. In many cases, when political or economic resources are limited, political entrepreneurs will activate latent cultural or religious identities to build power bases capable of acquiring and controlling these resources. Unfortunately, these cultural roots are often used to commit atrocious crimes during a war; Crimes that only help to anchor and immortalize these identities. Whether these identities are real or perceived, they are valued in intense and long-term conflicts. One of the most difficult tasks in structuring peace agreements is therefore to enable reconciliation in order to build trust and restore „normal“ relations between the warring factions. Implementation agreements specify the details of a comprehensive agreement or framework agreement. An implementation agreement almost always requires a new round of negotiations with the parties involved. These negotiations refine and define framework agreements or comprehensive agreements in practice. The aim of the implementation agreements is to develop the modalities and mechanics in order to facilitate the implementation of the comprehensive agreement. The terms of application are not always written formal documents.

Sometimes these are oral commitments, exchanges of letters and joint public statements that help accelerate implementation. Because of this fact, it is generally very difficult to keep implementation agreements in mind. Often, the informality of these agreements complicates the engagement of the parties. While formal written implementation agreements often take longer, it is generally considered that the parties are required, serious and obligated to implement them. The Treaty of Versaille is arguably the most infamous peace treaty and is held responsible by many historians for the rise of Nazism in Germany and the outbreak of World War II in 1939. The costly reparations that Germany had to pay to the victors, the fact that Germany had to assume sole responsibility for the beginning of the war and the severe restrictions on German rearmament were all in the Treaty of Versaille and caused great discontent in Germany. The question of whether or not the treaty can be held responsible for the opening of another war is an example of the difficulties associated with peace.